aylab vs Magic vs Subgraphs
Build an ecosystem optimized for your goals while opening up new revenue streams.
Comparison Summary
aylab, Magic and Subgraphs each address unique challenges in the web3 ecosystem, offering complementary strengths for builders. aylab is a web3 developer toolset providing open-source resources and code repositories for blockchain development. Magic provides enterprise-grade, non-custodial wallet infrastructure and passwordless authentication APIs for seamless Web3 onboarding and wallet management. The Graph is a decentralized indexing protocol that organizes blockchain data and makes it easily accessible via GraphQL. Together, these tools serve different but overlapping user needs, making them valuable components in a modern web3 development stack.
| At a Glance | |||
| Composability | |||
| Cross-Chain | |||
| Customizability | |||
| Developer Support | |||
| Ease of Integration | |||
| Performance | |||
| Key Features | |||
| Core Capabilities | Multiple GitHub Repositories, Comprehensive Documentation | API Wallets with Core and Express APIs, Embedded Wallet SDKs, Multi-chain support, Newton Protocol | Subgraphs, Substreams, Token API |
| Chain Support | — | +32 | +46 |
| Best For | Infrastructure Developers, DeFi Developers | Infrastructure Developers, DeFi Developers | DeFi Developers, NFT Platform Developers |
| Pricing | |||
| Free Tier | Open Source | Free | Hosted Service |
| Paid Features | — | 1 paid tiers | 1 paid tiers |
| Custom Plans | — | Enterprise plans | — |
Add a related tool
Related Tools
Explore web3 competitors and apps like aylab.
